Conduit vs Quo
The same job, at a price that climbs every time you hire someone.
Conduit
Quo
Price per user
$1
billed annually
$15
billed annually
Free tier
Yes
one user, no card
No
paid from the first seat
Shared inbox
Yes
core of the product
Yes
Shared numbers with a synced team inbox is the product
Licence minimum
None
one seat is fine
None stated
Quo pricing as published by rezora.io. Verify before deciding.
Feature by feature
| Capability | Conduit | Quo |
|---|---|---|
| Shared team inbox | Yes.One inbox, shared, on one number. | Yes.Shared numbers with a synced team inbox is the product. |
| Texting built in | Yes.Texting built in. Bring your own Twilio account. | Yes.US and Canada texting included; 10DLC registration costs a one-time $19.50 plus roughly $1.50-3/mo. |
| Call tracking | No.Not built yet. | Partial.Analytics and reporting start on Business and above, not on Starter. |
| Self-hostable | No.Not built yet. | No.Cloud-only. |
Pick Quo if
Quo nails the small-team shared-number experience. A clean, synced inbox for calls and texts is the core of the product rather than a feature bolted onto a phone system.
- Call tracking: partial
- Self-hostable: no
Pick Conduit if
Conduit does the core of what Quo does - one shared number, one inbox, texts the whole team can see - without the per-seat price growing with your headcount.
- $1 per user
- No licence minimum
- Free for one user
01Create an account02Connect your number03Invite your team04Start texting
about five minutesTry it against Quo.
Free for one user, no card. If it does not beat Quo for your team, you have lost nothing but an afternoon.
Get started